Stof vs. Temporal/Airflow
TL;DR
Temporal, Airflow, and Prefect are workflow orchestration platforms with servers, databases, UIs, and heavy infrastructure
Stof is a lightweight document format where workflows are portable, executable data
Key difference: Temporal/Airflow require infrastructure to run. Stof workflows are just documents you can execute anywhere.
Comparison
All let you:
Define multi-step workflows
Handle retries and error recovery
Orchestrate distributed tasks
Track workflow state and history
Architecture
Server + Workers
Server + Scheduler + Workers
Server + Agents
No server needed
Infrastructure
Required
Required
Required
Optional
Format
Code (Go, Python, Java)
Python DAGs
Python flows
Stof documents
Deployment
Complex
Complex
Medium
Copy a file
Portability
Tied to Cluster
Tied to Instance
Tied to Cloud Server
Run anywhere
Size overhead
~100MB + runtime
~500MB + deps
~50MB + runtime
~4MB runtime
State management
Database required
Database required
Database required
Optional (in-document)
UI/Monitoring
✅ Rich UI
✅ Rich UI
✅ Rich UI
🟡 Basic via logs
Best for
Enterprise workflows
Batch data pipelines
Modern data workflows
Lightweight, open-source, portable workflow definitions
The Core Difference
Temporal/Airflow/Prefect:
"Deploy a workflow platform, then deploy your workflows to it."
You need servers, databases, monitoring, and operational overhead.
Stof:
"The workflow IS a document. Execute it wherever you need."
No platform required. The workflow is portable data. Open-source.
The Bottom Line
Use Temporal when:
You need mission-critical workflow durability
Workflows run for days/weeks/months
Your team needs rich monitoring and debugging
You can afford the infrastructure and operational overhead
Use Airflow when:
You're building batch data pipelines
You need scheduling and backfill capabilities
Your team is familiar with Python DAGs
You need extensive plugin ecosystem
Use Prefect when:
You want modern workflow orchestration
You prefer Python-native flows over DAGs
You want easier setup than Airflow
You're okay with cloud-hosted or self-hosted server
Use Stof when:
You need lightweight, open-source, portable workflows
Workflows are simple to medium complexity
You don't want to manage infrastructure
You need workflows as API payloads
You're building edge/IoT/embedded systems
Cost and simplicity matter more than rich monitoring
Use Multiple when:
You need Temporal/Airflow's orchestration + Stof's portability
Core workflows in Temporal, transformation logic in Stof
Large-scale scheduling (Airflow) + lightweight execution (Stof)
Last updated
Was this helpful?